This course will introduce you to core information sources and services in the fields of anthropology, communication, economics, education, geography, history, journalism, political science, psychology, and sociology. You will work with an extensive list of readings on studying the information needs and information-seeking behavior of user groups in these fields. Examples of questions addressed in the course include: How and where social scientists look for information? What types and sources of information do they use and why? Who among the social scientists uses government information the most and why? What challenges do social scientists face in looking for information? What factors influence their information-seeking experiences? What methods do researchers use to examine the information needs, information-seeking behavior, and information use of social scientists? You will answer several sets of reference questions using both print and electronic sources. You will also develop an annotated research guide to enhance your writing skills, gain familiarity with a specific topic, and to develop an understanding of the various sources and types of materials and services available on the topic. The course is designed primarily for students who anticipate working as reference librarians, bibliographers, or subject specialists in research libraries, but other students are also welcome to take the course. S501 (Reference) is a prerequisite for S522.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The primary goals and objectives of the course are to help students:
- Develop an understanding of the information needs and information behavior of social scientists;
- Acquire knowledge of the major information sources and services available to social scientists;
- Learn about, and be prepared for, the various roles and responsibilities of social sciences information intermediaries in their quest for meeting the
information needs of clients; and
- Design new user-centered reference sources and services.
ASSIGNMENTS
The goals and objectives of the course will be achieved by completing a variety of tasks, including:
- Readings and Class Participation: While there will be some lecturing, S522 will mostly run like a seminar in which the focus will be on discussing assigned readings and projects and sharing of knowledge and ideas. Occasionally, you will use the computer lab to support class activities and complete course assignments.
- Take-Home Assignments: The questions in these assignments are designed to familiarize you with: (1) important and popular social sciences information sources; (2) effective and efficient search strategies; and (3) resource evaluation methods. If done in groups (two students in each group), these assignments will additionally enhance your collaborative experience and skills.
- Database Review and Presentation: This assignment will require you to select, review, and present a social science database of your choice. The assignment must be done in groups of 3-4 students. More details on this assignment will be given in class.
- Client Interview and Search Assignment: This assignment will require you to interview an IU faculty member working on a social science research topic, identify his or her information needs, and then use relevant search methods and tools to identify needed research materials for the faculty member. In addition to familiarizing students with sources, research information retrieval systems, and interview and search strategies and techniques, this assignment should allow students to learn more about the information needs and information-seeking behavior of social science faculty and the type of information sources they use and how they identify these sources. More details on this project will be provided in class.
- Research Guide: A research guide is an organized list of articles, books, dissertations, and other published and unpublished materials/information sources on a particular topic. Research guides bring together the ideas and work of many authors so that others could use them for advanced research. Each item listed in the guide is annotated in a descriptive and evaluative paragraph (50-100 words long). The annotations usually identify for the user the most important, useful, salient information found in the item. The goals of this assignment are to: (1) allow you to become a subject expert on a particular topic; (2) introduce you to important and popular social sciences resources and selection tools; (3) introduce you to effective and efficient search strategies; (4) familiarize you with resource evaluation methods; and (5) provide you with experience in compiling research guides. More information about the project will be provided in class.
ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION
You are expected to attend all sessions in this course. If you must miss a class because of an illness or family emergency, please let the instructor know. Also make arrangements with your classmates to pick up class notes. Two points will be deducted from your final grade for each absence. If you miss three classes, you will be asked to drop the course. Active and meaningful participation is a requirement in this course. Your participation grade will be assessed on the basis of regular attendance, participation in class discussion, and demonstration of familiarity with assigned readings and projects.
EVALUATION
In addition to assignment specifics, all written work will be evaluated on the basis of the quality of writings and the amount of reflection, analysis, comparison, and evaluation provided in them. Use of appropriate sources and/or literature will also be assessed. Due dates are provided on the course schedule below and on individual assignment sheets. LATE assignments will lose one letter grade from the grade they would have gotten had they been turned in on time. In case an absence is inevitable on a day an assignment is due, please e-mail it to me to avoid the penalty. An "Incomplete" will be given to students who fail to submit all of their projects before the end of the semester. Unless otherwise stated on individual assignment sheets, all students are to work individually and follow IU's honor code.
- Two Take-Home Assignments (10% each) 20%
- Client Interview and Search Assignment 20%
- Database Review and Presentation 15%
- Research Guide 30%
- Class Participation 15%
GRADING
Grades will be assigned on an A, B, C, D bases. The following definitions of letter grades have been defined by student and faculty members of the Committee on Improvement of Instruction and have been approved by the faculty (November 11, 1996) as an aid in evaluation of academic performance and to assist students by giving them an understanding of the grading standards at SLIS.
| Grade |
GPA |
MEANING |
| A |
4.0 |
Outstanding achievement. Student performance demonstrates full command of the course materials and evinces a high level of originality and/or creativity that far surpasses course expectations. |
| A- |
3.7 |
Excellent achievement. Student performance demonstrates thorough knowledge of the course materials and exceeds course expectations by completing all requirements in a superior manner. |
| B+ |
3.3 |
Very good work. Student performance demonstrates above-average comprehension of the course materials and exceeds course expectations on all tasks as defined in the course syllabus. |
| B |
3.0 |
Good work. Student performance meets designated course expectations, demonstrates understanding of the course materials and is at an acceptable level. |
| B- |
2.7 |
Marginal work. Student performance demonstrates incomplete understanding of course materials. |
C+ C
|
2.3 2.0 |
Unsatisfactory work. Student performance demonstrates incomplete and inadequate understanding of course materials. |
C- D+ D D- |
1.7 1.3 1.0 .07 |
Unacceptable work. Coursework performed at this level will not count toward the MLS or MIS degree. For the course to count towards the degree, the student must repeat the course with a passing grade. |
| F |
0.0 |
Failing. Student may continue in program only with permission of the Dean. |
Please note that all assignments and readings can be accessed through ERes. Also note that this course demands a HEAVY commitment of your time. It is expected that you will spend an average of eight hours each week on readings and assignments.
ACADEMIC DISHONESTY
There is extensive documentation and discussion of the issue of academic dishonesty in the Indiana University "
Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Conduct." Of particular relevance is the section on plagiarism:
Indiana University and SLIS policies on academic dishonesty will be followed. Students found to be engaged in plagiarism, cheating, and other types of dishonesty will be reported to the Dean's Office for appropriate action. As a rule of thumb, when in doubt, cite the source!
SCHEDULE AND READINGS (all assignments and most readings can be accessed through ERes)
January 09: Introduction to Course; Social Science Librarianship
- Fagan, J. C. (2003). Social sciences librarian. In Encyclopedia of library and information science (pp. 2662-2667). New York: Marcel Dekker.
January 16: Social Science Research
- Andersen, H. (2000). Influence and reputation in the social sciences - How much do researchers agree? Journal of Documentation, 56(6), 674-692.
- Dogan, M. (1996). The hybridization of social science knowledge. Library Trends, 45(2), 296-314.
- Haycock, L. (2007). Interdisciplinarity in education research: The graduate student perspective. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 25(2), 79-92.
- Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Learning and knowledge networks in interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1079-1092.
- Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research, (pp. 473-496). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
January 23: Information-Seeking Behavior of Social Scientists
- Case, D. O. (2006). Information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 293-327.
- Mazurkiewicz, O., & Potts, C. H. (2007). Researching Latin America: A survey of how the new generation is doing its research. Latin American Research Review, 42(3), 161-182.
- Meho, L. I., & Tibbo, H. R. (2003). Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 570-587.
- Shen, Y. (2006). Information seeking in academic research: A study of the sociology faculty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Information Technology and Libraries, 26(1), 4-13.
January 30: Encyclopedias and Gateways in the Social Sciences
- Bay, M. T. (2002). The development and continuing value of psychology encyclopedias. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 20(2), 65-74.
- Evans, L. (2002). The knowledge of psychology: A comparative review of three reference sources. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 20(2), 59-63.
- Fields, A. M. (2003). Tracing the evolution of a discipline: Education and the three major encyclopedias of the social sciences. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 21(2), 57-71.
- IFLA. Social Science Libraries Section (2005). General social science resources page. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions.
- Johnson, R., & Stewart, D. (2003). The International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: A review. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 21(2), 73-83.
February 06: Subject Access in the Social Sciences (DUE: Assignment #1)
- Blaemers, J. (2006). A history of the development and maintenance of the Sociological Abstracts Thesaurus of Sociological Indexing Terms. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 25(1), 111-122.
- Gross T., & Taylor, A. G. (2005). What have we got to lose? The effect of controlled vocabulary on keyword searching results. College & Research Libraries, 66(3), 212-230.
- Kotter, W. R. (2002). Improving subject access in anthropology. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 20(2), 1-15.
- Mann, T. (2003). Why LC subject headings are more important than ever. American Libraries, 34(9), 52-54.
February 13: Social Science Databases
- Banks, R. A. (2006). Decision-making factors related to bibliographic database cancellation. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 25(1), 93-110.
- Blessinger, K., & Olle, M. (2004). Content analysis of the leading general academic databases. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 28(3), 335-346.
- Tyler, D. C. (2005). The communication studies researcher and the communication studies indexes. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 23(2), 19-46.
February 20: Book Reviews and Citation Searching in the Social Sciences
- Ballard, S., & Henry, M. (2006). Citation searching: New players, new tools. The Searcher, 14(9), 24-33.
- Hartley, J. (2006). Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1194-1207.
- Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences' literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 161-169.
February 27: Government Social Science Information (DUE: Assignment #2)
- Asher, C., Yi, H., & Knapp, S. (2002). Effective instruction needed to improve students' use of government documents. Journal of Government Information, 29(5), 293-301.
- Cheney, D. (2006). Government information collections and services in the social sciences: The subject specialist integration model. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(3), 303-312.
- DeDecker, S., & Forte, E. (2006). Statistical information from the government: Teaching the general reference librarian. DttP: Documents to the People, 34(2), 15-17.
- DeWitt, L., Effland, A.B.W., Hull, T.J., & Pemberton, D.M. (2004). Creating, preserving, and using federal social science data. Journal of Government Information, 30(4), 451-462.
- Dreger, M. (2006). Government information for consumers. DttP: Documents to the People, 34(2), 27-28.
- Graves, S. J. (2006). Things I wish I knew about documents, and things I'm glad I know: A humanities librarian's perspective. DttP: Documents to the People, 34(3), 27-28.
- Pierce, J. E. (2006). Things I wish I knew about documents, and things I'm glad I know - Dysfunction junction: The intersection of historians & government documents. DttP: Documents to the People, 34(3), 35-36.
- Read, E. J. (2006). Things I wish I knew about documents, and things I'm glad I know: So much data, so much to know. DttP: Documents to the People, 34(3), 25-26.
- Sears, S. (2006). Government information for parents and teachers. DttP: Documents to the People, 34(2), 23, 25-26.
- Tapager, H. (2006). Things I wish I knew about documents, and things I'm glad I know: Getting down to business about government documents. DttP: Documents to the People, 34(3), 33-34.
March 05: In-Class Activities and Q/A Session on Remaining Projects
March 19: Student Presentations (DUE: Database Review and Presentation)
March 26: Data Archives in Social Science Research
- Anderson, B. (2003). Social science gateways. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 21(2), 85-89.
- Memess, H., Dack, C., & Whittle, S. (2007). Intute: law - finding the best of the Web for law. Legal Information Management, 7(1), 46-53.
- Parry, O., & Mauthner, N.S. (2004). Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data. Sociology: The Journal of the British Sociological Association, 38(1), 139-152.
- Read, E. J. (2007). Data services in academic libraries: Assessing needs and promoting services. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46(3), 61-75.
April 02: Archives in Social Science Research (DUE: Client Interview & Search Assignment)
- Duff, W., Craig, B., & Cherry, J. (2004). Historians' use of archival sources: Promises and pitfalls of the digital age. The Public Historian, 26(2), 7-22.
- Duff, W., & Fox, A. (2006). 'You're a guide rather than an expert': Archival reference from an archivist's point of view. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 27(2), 129-153.
- Hill, A. (2004). Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 25(2), 139-148.
- Valge, J., & Kibal, B. (2007). Restrictions on access to archives and records in Europe: A history and the current situation. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(2), 193-214.
- Yakel, E. (2005). Seeking information, seeking connections, seeking meaning: Genealogists and family historians. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 10(1).
April 09: Open Access and Institutional Repositories
- Anderson, B. (2004). Open access and institutional repositories. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 23(1), 97-101.
- Anderson, B. (2004). Open access journals. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 22(2), 93-99.
- Antelman , K. (2006). Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences. Learned Publishing, 19(2), 85-95.
- Bailey, C., Jr. (2005). The role of reference librarians in institutional repositories. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 259-267.
- Jenkins, B., Breakstone, E., & Hixson, C. (2005). Content in, content out: The dual roles of the reference librarian in institutional repositories. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 312-324.
- Pelizzari, E. (2004). Academic authors and open archives: A survey in the social science field. Libri, 54(2), 113-122.
- Watson, S. (2007). Authors' attitudes to, and awareness and use of, a university institutional repository. Serials, 20(3), 225-230.
April 16: Publishers and Publishing in the Social Sciences
- Budd, J.M., & Urton, E.R. (2003). University press publishing and academic library holdings. Publishing Research Quarterly, 19(2), 5-13.
- Jordy, M.L., McGrath, E.L., & Rutledge, J.B. (1999). Book reviews as a tool for assessing publisher reputation. College & Research Libraries, 60(2), 132-142.
- Metz, P., & Stemmer, J. (1996). A reputational study of academic publishers. College & Research Libraries, 57(3), 234-247.
- Wiberley, S.E. (2004). The social sciences: Who won the '90s in scholarly book publishing. College & Research Libraries, 65(6), 505-523.
April 23: Future of Social Science Librarianship (DUE: Research Guide)
- Fagan, J. C. (2003). Social sciences librarian. In Encyclopedia of library and information science (pp. 2662-2667). New York: Marcel Dekker.
JOURNALS TO BROWSE
In addition to the above readings, I encourage you to make a habit of browsing incoming issues of the following journals (all are available online and in SLIS Library):
- Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian
- Charleston Advisor
- College and Research Libraries
- Library Journal
- Reference and User Services Quarterly