Spring, 2008
Instructor: Tom Nisonger
e-mail: nisonge@indiana.edu
office hours: Thursday, 2 to 4 P.M.
office phone: 855-5388
SYLLABUS
COURSE OBJECTIVES
Upon the course's completion, students should:
1. understand what methodologies are available for evaluating library collections and services;
2. understand the benefits and drawbacks of various methodologies;
3. be able to identify which methodologies are most appropriate for a particular evaluation project;
4. be able to design and carry out an evaluation project; and
5. understand the challenges of evaluation in an electronic
era.
METHODS OF INSTRUCTION
The following methods of instruction will be
used:
1) lectures
2) classroom discussion
3) assigned readings
4) student projects
CLASS ATTENDANCE
Class attendance is required unless there is an extenuating
circumstance, such as illness or family emergency. A record of each student's
classroom attendance will be maintained by the instructor to assist with
assigning the 10% of the grade based on classroom attendance and participation.
A student missing class should e-mail the instructor explaining
why.
GRADING
The final course grade will be based on two projects and class attendance plus participation. Each project will count 45% and class attendance and participation will count 10%.
In computing the final grade the following numerical equivalents
will be used:
95+ = A
90-94= A-
85-89= B+
80-84= B
75-79= B-
70-74= C+
65-69= C
60-64= C-
etc.
TENTATIVE CLASS SCHEDULE
Monday, January 7 Introduction to Course
Monday, January 14 Overview of Evaluation
Methodologies
Monday, January 21 NO CLASS—MARTIN LUTHER KING
DAY
Monday, January 28 The Checklist Method
Monday, February 4 Overview of Collection
Evaluation
Monday, February 11 Use of Bibliometrics in
Evaluation
Monday, February 18 Journal Evaluation
Monday, February 25 PROJECT # 1 DUE. Availability & Document
Delivery Studies
Monday, March 3 Availability & Document Delivery
Studies
Monday, March 10 NO CLASS—SPRING
BREAK
Monday, March 17 Evaluation of Use of Library
Resources
Monday, March 24 Evaluation of Reference Services: Question
Answering
Monday, March 31 Evaluation of Reference Services: Database Searching
Monday, April 7 Evaluation of Technical
Services
Monday, April 14 Evaluation of Overall Library
Performance
Monday, April 21 ROJECT # 2 DUE. Technology &
Evaluation
READINGS
(Students should read at least three readings of their choice for
each week. Additional readings may be suggested during the
course.)
ITEMS OF GENERAL INTEREST (ON RESERVE IN KENT-COOPER
ROOM)
Baker, Sharon L., and F. Wilfrid Lancaster. Measurement and
Evaluation of Library Services. 2d ed. Arlington, Va.: Information Resources
Press, 1991.
Bertot, John Carlo, and Denise M. Davis, eds. Planning and
Evaluating Library Networked Services and Resources. Westport, CT and
London: Libraries Unlimited, 2004.
Bertot, John Carlo, Charles R. McClure, and Joe Ryan. Statistics
and Performance Measures for Public Library Networked Services. Chicago,
American Library Association, 2001.
Durrance, Joan C. , and Karen E. Fisher. How Libraries and
Librarians Help: A Guide to Identifying User-Centered Outcomes. Chicago:
American Library Association, 2005.
Everhart, Nancy. Evaluating the School Library Media Center:
Analysis Techniques and Research Practices. Englewood, CO: Libraries
Unlimited, 1998.
Guide to Performance Evaluation of Serials Vendors;
Association for Library Collections & Technical Services, Serials Section
Acquisitions Committee. Chicago: American Library Association,
1997.
Hall, Blaine H. Collection Assessment Manual for College and
University Libraries. Phoenix, Ariz.: Oryx Press, 1985.
Hernon, Peter, and Robert E. Dugan. An Action Plan for Outcomes
Assessment in Your Library. Chicago: American Library Association,
2002.
Lancaster, F. Wilfrid. If You Want to Evaluate Your
Library... 2d ed. Champaign: University of Illinois, Graduate School of
Library and Information Science, 1993.
McClure, Charles R., and others. Statistics, Measures and Quality
Standards for Assessing Digital Reference Library Services: Guidelines and
Procedures. Draft version, July 30, 2002, available on Web at
URL: http://quartz.syr.edu/quality/Quality.pdf
Nisonger, Thomas E. Evaluation of Library Collections, Access,
and Electronic Resources: A Literature Guide and Annotated Bibliography.
Westport, CT and London: Libraries Unlimited (Greenwood Publishing Group),
2003.
Van House, Nancy A., Beth T. Weil, and Charles R. McClure.
Measuring Academic Library Performance: a Practical Approach. Chicago:
American Library Association, 1990.
Van House, Nancy A., Douglas Zweizig, and Eleanor Jo Rodger.
Output Measures for Public Libraries: A Manual of Standardized Procedures.
2d ed. Chicago: American Library Association, 1987.
Wallace, Danny P., and Connie Van Fleet, eds. Library Evaluation:
A Casebook and Can-Do Guide. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited,
2001.
Walter, Virginia A. Output Measures and More: Planning and Evaluating Public
Library Services for Young Adults. Chicago : Young Adult
Library Services Association, Public Library Association, American Library
Association, 1995.
Walter, Virginia A. Output Measures for Public Library Service to
Children: A Manual of Standardized Procedures. Chicago: American Library
Association, 1992.
White, Andrew, and Eric Djiva Kamal. E-Metrics for Library and
Information Professionals: How to Use Data for Managing and Evaluating
Electronic Resource Collections. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers,
2006.
Whitlatch, Jo Bell. Evaluating Reference Services: A Practical Guide. Chicago: American Library Association, 2000.
Baker, Sharon L., and F. Wilfrid Lancaster. "The Evaluation of
Library Services: An Introduction." In their Measurement and Evaluation of
Library Services, 1-26. 2d ed. Arlington, Va.: Information Resources Press,
1991.
Baker, Sharon L., and F. Wilfrid Lancaster. "The Range and Scope of
Library Services." In their Measurement and Evaluation of Library
Services, 335-367. 2d ed. Arlington, Va.: Information Resources Press, 1991.
(ON RESERVE IN KENT COOPER ROOM)
Lancaster, F. Wilfrid. "Introduction." In If You Want to Evaluate Your Library..., 1-20. Champaign: University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, 1993.
Dennison, Russell F. "Quality Assessment of Collection Development
Through Tiered Checklists: Can You Prove You Are a Good Collection Developer?"
Collection Building 19, no. 1 (2000): 24-26.
Elzy, Cheryl and F. Wilfrid Lancaster. "Looking at a Collection in
Different Ways: A Comparison of Methods of Bibliographical Checking."
Collection Management 12, nos. 3/4 (1990): 1-10.
Goldhor, Herbert. "Analysis of an Inductive Method of Evaluating the
Book Collection of a Public Library." Libri 23, no. 1 (1973):
6-17.
Halliday, Blane. "Identifying Library Policy Issues with List
Checking." In Library Evaluation: A Casebook and Can-Do Guide, edited by
Danny P. Wallace and Connie Van Fleet, 140-52. Englewood, CO: Libraries
Unlimited, 2001. (ON RESERVE IN KENT COOPER ROOM)
Harris, Matthew, and Gregory A. Crawford. "The Ownership of
Religious Texts by Academic Libraries." College & Research Libraries
63 (September 2002): 450-58.
Lundin, Anne H. "List-Checking in Collection Development: An
Imprecise Art." Collection Management 11, nos. 3/4 (1989):
103-12.
Meehan, William .F. III and Thomas E. Nisonger. "The Rowing
Collection in the Free Library of Philadelphia OPAC: A Checklist Evaluation."
Collection Management 30, no. 4 (2005): 85-101. [Note that actual
publication date is 2007, although issue date is 2005.]
Schaffer, Thomas. "Psychology Citations Revisited: Behavioral
Research in the Age of Electronic Resources." Journal of Academic
Librarianship 30 (September 2004): 354-60.
FOR FEBRUARY 4: OVERVIEW OF COLLECTION
EVALUATION
American Library Association. Resources and Technical Services
Division. Resources Section. Collection Management and Development Committee.
Subcommittee on Guidelines for Collection Development. Guide to the
Evaluation of Library Collections. Barbara Lockett, ed. Chicago: American
Library Association, 1989. (Collection Management and Development Guides, no.
2).
Baker, Sharon L., and F. Wilfrid Lancaster. "Collection Evaluation:
Materials-Centered Approaches" and "Collection Evaluation: Use-Centered
Approaches." In their Measurement and Evaluation of Library Services,
39-122. 2d ed. Arlington, Va.: Information Resources Press, 1991. (ON RESERVE IN
KENT COOPER ROOM)
Clayton, Peter, and G. E. Gorman. "Collection Evaluation and Review." In their Managing Information Resources in Libraries: Collection Management in Theory and Practice, 160-86.
London: Library Association Publishing: 2001.
Evans, G. Edward, with the assistance of Margaret Zarnosky Saponaro.
"Evaluation." In their Developing Library and Information Center
Collections, 314-338, 5th ed. Westport, CT and
London: Libraries Unlimited, 2005.
Everhart, Nancy. "Collections." In her Evaluating the School
Library Media Center: Analysis Techniques and Research Practices, 91-117.
Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1998.
Hall, Blaine H. Collection Assessment Manual for College and
University Libraries. Phoenix, Ariz.: Oryx Press, 1985.
Mosher, Paul. "Quality and Library Collections: New Directions in
Research and Practice in Collection Evaluation." In Advances in
Librarianship, vol. 13, edited by Wesley Simonton, 211-38. Orlando, Fla.:
Academic Press, 1984.
Van Fleet, Connie. "Evaluating Collections." In Library
Evaluation: A Casebook and Can-Do Guide, edited by Danny P. Wallace and
Connie Van Fleet, 117-28. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited,
2001.
FOR FEBRUARY 11: USE OF BIBLIOMETRICS IN
EVALUATION
Adkins, Denice, and John Budd. "Scholarly Productivity of U.S. LIS
Faculty." Library and Information Science Research 28 (Autumn 2006):
374-89.
Adkins, Denice, and John Budd. "Corrigendum to
'Scholarly Productivity of U.S. LIS Faculty' [Library and
Information Science Research 28 (2006) 374-389]." Library and Information
Science Research 29 (March 2007): 154-58.
Buzzard, Marion L., and Doris E. New. "An Investigation of
Collection Support for Doctoral Research." College & Research
Libraries 44 (November 1983): 469-475.
Cameron, Brian D. "Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data:
Uses, Abuses, and Implications." Portal 5 (January 2005):
105-125.
Devin, Robin B., and Martha Kellogg. "The Serial/Monograph Ratio in
Research Libraries: Budgeting in Light of Citation Studies." College &
Research Libraries 51 (January 1990): 46-54.
Dilevko, Juris, and Keren Deli. "Improving Collection Development
and Reference Services for Interdisciplinary Fields through Analysis of Citation
Patterns: An Example Using Tourism Studies." College & Research
Libraries 65 (May 2004): 216-41.
Heinzkill, Richard. "References in Scholarly English and American
Literary Journals Thirty Years Later: A Citation Analysis." College &
Research Libraries 68 (March 2007): 141-53.
Nisonger, Thomas E. "A Test of Two Citation Checking Techniques for
Evaluating Political Science Collections in University Libraries." Library
Resources & Technical Services 27 (April/June 1983):
163-76.
Stelk, Roger Edward, and F. Wilfrid Lancaster. "The Use of Textbooks in Evaluating the Collection of an Undergraduate Library." Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory 14, no. 2 (1990): 191-193.
FOR FEBRUARY 18: JOURNAL EVALUATION
METHODS
Black, Steven. "Using Citation Analysis to Pursue a Core Collection
of Journals for Communication Disorders." Library Resources & Technical
Services 45 (January 2001): 3-9.
Esteibar, Belen Altuna, and F. W. Lancaster. "Ranking of Journals in
Library and Information Science by Research and Teaching Relatedness."
Serials Librarian 23, nos. 1/2 (1992): 1-10.
Nisonger, Thomas E. "The Benefits and Drawbacks of Impact Factor for
Journal Collection Management in Libraries." Serials Librarian 47, nos.
1-2. (2004): 57-76.
Nisonger, Thomas E. "Journals in the Core Collection: Definition,
Identification, and Applications." Serials Librarian 51, nos. 3-4 (2007):
51-73.
Nisonger, Thomas E. "Use of the Journal Citation Reports for
Serials Management in Research Libraries: An Investigation of the Effect of
Self-Citation on Journal Rankings in Library and Information Science and
Genetics." College & Research Libraries 61 (May 2000):
263-75.
Nisonger, Thomas E. , and Charles H. Davis. "The Perception of
Library and Information Science Journals by LIS Education Deans and ARL Library
Directors: A Replication of the Kohl-Davis Study." College & Research
Libraries 66 (July 2005): 341-77.
Vaughan, Liwen, and Debora Shaw. "Web Citation Data for Impact
Assessment: A Comparison of Four Science Disciplines." Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology 56 (August 2005):
1075-87.
FOR February 25 & March 3: AVAILABILITY &
DOCUMENT DELIVERY STUDIES
Baker, Sharon L., and F. Wilfrid Lancaster. "Evaluation of Materials
Availability." In their Measurement and Evaluation of Library Services,
143-180. 2d ed. Arlington, Va.: Information Resources Press, 1991. (ON RESERVE
IN KENT COOPER ROOM)
Ciliberti, Anne C., Marie L. Radford, and Gary P. Radford, "Empty
Handed? A Material Availability Study and Transaction Log Analysis
Verification." Journal of Academic Librarianship 24 (July 1998):
282-89.
Gregory, David J., and Wayne A. Pedersen. "Book Availability
Revisited: Turnaround Time for Recalls versus Interlibrary Loans." College
& Research Libraries 64 (July 2003): 283-299.
Lancaster, F. Wilfrid. "Shelf Availability." In his If You Want
to Evaluate Your Library..., 129-146. Champaign: University of Illinois,
Graduate School of Library and Information Science, 1993. (ON RESERVE IN KENT
COOPER ROOM)
Nisonger, Thomas E. "A Review and Analysis of Library Availability
Studies." Library Resources & Technical Services 51 (January 2007):
30-49.
Shaw-Kokot, Julia, and Claire de la Varre. "Using a Journal
Availability Study to Improve Access." Bulletin of the Medical Library
Association 89 (January 2001): 21-28.
Steynberg, Susan, and S. F. Rossouw. "Testing Orr's Document
Delivery Test on Biomedical Journals in South Africa." Bulletin of the
Medical Library Association 83 (January 1995): 78-84.
Van House, Nancy A., Beth T. Weil, and Charles R. McClure.
"Materials Availability and Use." In their Measuring Academic Library
Performance; A Practical Approach, 54-76. Chicago: American Library
Association, 1990. (ON RESERVE IN KENT COOPER ROOM)
Yang, Zheng Ye (Lan)). "Improving Turnaround Time for Document
Delivery of Materials Owned But Not on the Shelf: A Case Study from an Academic
Library." Journal of Academic Librarianship 32 (March 2006):
200-204.
FOR MARCH 17: EVALUATION OF USE OF LIBRARY
MATERIALS
Bertot, John Carlo. "E-metrics and Performance Indicators:
Availability and Use." In Planning and Evaluating Library Networked Services
and Resources, edited by John Carlo Bertot and Denise M. Davis, 95-126.
Westport, CT and London: Libraries Unlimited, 2004.
Black, Steve. "Impact of Full Text on Print Journal Use at a Liberal
Arts College." Library Resources & Technical Services 49 (January
2005): 19-26, 56.
Christianson, Marilyn, and Marsha Aucoin. "Electronic or Print
Books: Which are Used?" Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical
Serviceas 29, no. 1 (2005); 71-81.
Bertot, John Carlo, Charles R. McClure, and Joe Ryan. Statistics
and Performance Measures for Public Library Networked Services, 6-37.
Chicago, American Library Association, 2001. (ON RESERVE IN KENT COOPER
ROOM)
Blecic, Deborah D., Joan B. Fiscella, and Stephen E. Wiberley, Jr. "
Measurement of Use of Electronic Resources : Advances in Use Statistics and
Innovations in Resource Management." College & Research Libraries 68
(January 2007): 26-44.
Knievel, Jennifer, Heather Wicht, and Lynn Silipigni Connaway, "Use of Circulation Statistics and Interlibrary Loan Data in Collection Management." College & Research Libraries 67 (January 2006): 35-49.
Lancaster, F. Wilfrid. "Evaluation of the Collection: Analysis of
Use." In If You Want to Evaluate Your Library..., 51-75.
Champaign: University of Illinois, Graduate School of
Library and Information Science, 1993. (ON RESERVE IN KENT COOPER ROOM)
Lancaster, F. Wilfrid. "In-House Use." In If You Want to Evaluate
Your Library..., 76-86. Champaign: University of Illinois, Graduate School
of Library and Information Science, 1993. (ON RESERVE IN KENT COOPER
ROOM)
Martell, Charles. "The Elusive User: Changing Use Patterns in
Academic Libraries 1995 to 2004." College & Research Libraries 68
(September 2007): 435-44.
Tonta, Yasar, and Yurdagül Ünal. "Scatter of
Journals and Literature Obsolescence Reflected in Document Delivery Requests."
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56
(January 1, 2005): 84-94.
FOR MARCH 24: EVALUATION OF REFERENCE SERVICES:
QUESTION ANSWERING
Arnold, Julie, and Neal Kaske. "Evaluating the Quality of a Chat
Service." Portal: Libraries and the Academy 5 (April 2005):
177-93.
Baker, Lynda M., and Judith J. Field. "Reference Success: What has
Changed over the past Ten Years?" Public Libraries 39 (January/February
2000): 23-30.
Baker, Sharon L., and F. Wilfrid Lancaster. "Evaluation of Reference
Services: Question Answering." In their Measurement and Evaluation of Library
Services, 229-272. 2d ed. Arlington, Va.: Information Resources Press, 1991.
(ON RESERVE IN KENT COOPER ROOM)
Bradford, Jane T., Barbara Costello, and Robert Lenholt. "Reference
Service in the Digital Age: An Analysis of Sources Used to Answer Reference
Questions." Journal of Academic Librarianship 31 (May 2005):
263-72.
Crews, Kenneth D. "The Accuracy of Reference Service: Variables for
Research and Implementation." Library & Information Science Research
10 (July 1988): 331-355.
Gers, Ralph and Lillie J. Seward. "Improving Reference Performance:
Results of a Statewide Study." Library Journal 110 (November 1, 1985):
32-35.
Janes, Joseph, and Charles R. McClure. "The Web as a Reference Tool:
Comparisons with Traditional Sources." Public Libraries 38
(January/February 1999): 30-33, 36-39.
Lancaster, F. Wilfrid. "Question Answering." In his If You Want
to Evaluate Your Library..., 151-180. Champaign: University of Illinois,
Graduate School of Library and Information Science, 1993. (ON RESERVE IN KENT
COOPER ROOM)
Richardson, John V. "Reference is Better Than We Thought."
Library Journal 127 (April 15, 2002): 41-42.
Ross, Catherine Sheldrick, and Kirsti Nilsen. "Has the Internet
Changed Anything in Reference? The Library Visit Study, phase 2." Reference
and User Services Quarterly 40 (Winter 2000): 147-55.
Shachaf, Pnina, Lokman I. Meho, and Noriko Hara. "Cross-cultural
Analysis of E-mail Reference." Journal of Academic Librarianship 33
(March 2007): 243-53.
FOR MARCH 31: EVALUATION OF REFERENCE SERVICES:
DATABASE SEARCHING
Baker, Sharon L., and F. Wilfrid Lancaster. "Evaluation of Reference
Services: Database Searching." In their Measurement and Evaluation of Library
Services, 273-320. 2d ed. Arlington, Va.: Information Resources Press, 1991.
(ON RESERVE IN KENT COOPER ROOM)
Barnett, Andy. "A Survey of Internet Searches and Their Results."
Reference and User Services Quarterly 39 (Winter 1999):
177-81.
Lancaster, F. Wilfrid. "Database Searching." In If You Want to
Evaluate Your Library..., 181-219. Champaign: University of Illinois,
Graduate School of Library and Information Science, 1993. (ON RESERVE IN KENT
COOPER ROOM)
Nisonger, Thomas E. "Citation Autobiography: An Investigation of ISI
Database Coverage in Determining Author Citedness." College & Research
Libraries 65 (March 2004): 152-63.
Nowicki, Stacy. "Student vs. Search
Engine: Undergraduates Rank Results for Relevance." Portal 3, no. 3
(2003): 503-515.
Wu, Gang, and Jie Li. " Comparing Web Search Engine Performance in
Searching Consumer Health Information: Evaluation and Recommendations."
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 87 (October 1999):
456-61.
FOR APRIL 7: EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
American Library Association. Resources and Technical Services
Division. Resource Section. Collection Management and Development Committee and
the Acquisitions Committee. Guide to Performance Evaluation of Library
Materials Vendors. Chicago: ALA, 1988.
Fowler, David C., and Janet Arcand. "A Serials Acquisitions Cost
Study: Presenting a Case for Standard Serials Acquisitions Data Elements."
Library Resources & Technical Services 49 (April 2005):
109-22.
Morris, Anne, Julie Woodfield, and J. Eric Davies. "Experimental
Evaluation of Selected Electronic Document Delivery Systems." Journal of
Librarianship & Information Science 31 (September 1999):
135-44.
Nisonger, Thomas E. "Accessing Information: The Evaluation
Research." Collection Management 26, no. 1 (2001):
1-23.
Nisonger, Thomas E. "Cost Analysis of the LIBRIS II Automated
Acquisitions System at the University of Texas at Dallas Library." Library
Acquisitions: Practice & Theory 11, no. 3 (1987):
229-238.
Nisonger, Thomas E. "Theft and Staffing at a University Library Book
Sale." Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory 13, no. 4, (1989):
343-350.
Orkiszewski, Paul. "A Comparative Study of Amazon.com As a Library Book and Media Vendor."
Library Resources & Technical Services 49 (July 2005):
204-09.
Stevens, Peter H. "Who's Number One? Evaluating Acquisitions
Departments." Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services
23 (Spring 1999): 79-85.
The Vendor Study Group. "Regional Study of Vendor Performance for
In-Print Monographs." Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory 16, No.
1 (1992): 21-30.
FOR APRIL 14: EVALUATION OF OVERALL LIBRARY
PERFORMANCE
Cook, Colleen, Fred Heath, and Bruce Thompson.
"'Zones of Tolerance' in Perceptions of Library Service
Quality: A LIBQUAL+ Study." Portal 3, no. 1 (2003):
113-23.
Hennen, Thomas J., Jr. AGo Ahead, Name Them:
America=s
Best Public Libraries.@American Libraries 30
(January 1999): 72-76.
Hennen, Thomas J., Jr. "Great American Public Libraries: HAPLR
Ratings, Round Two." American Libraries 30 (September 1999):
64-68.
Hennen, Thomas J., Jr. "Hennen's American Public Library Ratings
2006." American Libraries 37 (November 2006): 40-42.
Jankowska, Maria Anna, Karen Hertel, and Nancy J. Young. "Improving
Library Service Quality to Graduate Students: LibQual+TM
Survey Results in a Practical Setting." Portal: Libraries and the
Academy 6, no. 1 (2006): 59-77.
LibQUAL Home Page on the Web: http://www.libqual.org/
FOR APRIL 21: TECHNOLOGY AND EVALUATION
Bowker's Book Analysis System. Available on the Web at URL: http://www.bowkersbookanalysis.com/bbas/
Dresang, Eliza T., Melissa Gross, and Leslie Edmonds Holt. "Project
CATE: Using Outcome Measures to Assess School-Age Children's Use of Technology
in Urban Public Libraries: A Collaborative Research Process." Library &
Information Science Research 25 (2003): 19-42.
Everhart, Nancy. "Technology." In her Evaluating the School
Library Media Center: Analysis Techniques and Research Practices, 151-77.
Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1998. (ON RESERVE IN KENT COOPER
ROOM)
Mathur, Mira. "Advent of Digital Libraries and Measuring Their
Performance: A Review." DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology 25
(March 2005): 19-25.
Mundle, Kavita, Harvey Huie, and Nirmala S. Bangalore. "ARL Library
Catalog Department Web Sites: An Evaluative Study." Library Resources &
Technical Services 50 (July 2006): 173-85.
Perkins, Gay Helen. "Will Libraries' Web-based Survey Methods
Replace Existing Non-Electronic Survey Methods." Information Technology &
Libraries 23 (September 2004): 123-26.
Worldcat Collection Analysis Service. Available on the Web at URL:
http://www.oclc.org/collectionanalysis/default.htm
NOTICE REGARDING ACADEMIC HONESTY. Students are reminded that double
submission of work for academic credit, fabrication, and plagiarism are serious
academic offenses that can result in penalties up to and including failure on an
assignment or failure in the course. According to the Indiana University Code
of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct, they are defined as
follows:
1. Cheating
g. "a student most not submit substantial portions of the same
academic work for credit or honors more than once without permission of the
instructor or program to whom the work is being submitted."
"2. Fabrication
A student must not falsify or invent any information or data in an academic
exercise including, but not limited to, records or reports, laboratory results,
and citation to the sources of information.
3. Plagiarism
Plagiarism is defined as presenting someone else's work, including the work of
other students, as one's own. Any ideas or materials taken from another source
for either written or oral use must be fully acknowledged, unless the
information is common knowledge. What is considered "common knowledge" may
differ from course to course.